Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: Borries Demeler <demeler@bioc09.v19.uthscsa.edu>
To : Jim Bloom <Jim.Bloom.B@bayer.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 12:44:54 -0500 (CDT)
Re: variation of local lnks
>
> I have been following this discussion with much interest and not having any
> compunctions about making a fool of myself I will so do.....I have been in the
> biochemistry business for going on 30 years now and I hate to admit it but I
> have never heard of either competent or incompetent monomers or dimers. What
> does competent and incompetent mean (other than referring to my scientific
> abilities) in plain english that even I can understand??
> Jim
>
Jim, in the context of this thread, consider my situation:
My sample is a heme-containing protein, and it appears that the
heme group is necessary to cause dimerization (as well as higher order
species). There is a population in the protein prep that somehow
lost its heme group, establishing a mixture of chemically similar,
but not identical proteins. While the MW is still approximately the
same, the properties are different, in particular the association
property. So when I talk about incompetent monomer, I mean this
subpopulation of monomers that are unable to associate.
Sometimes you have the opposite effect - once a protein is dimerized,
it becomes irreversibly linked, maybe through photo crosslinks or
cystein oxidation disulfide bridges. THis is an irreversible (or
incompetent) dimer.
Hope that clarifies it...
-Borries
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]