Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: Arthur Rowe <Arthur.Rowe@nottingham.ac.uk>
To : rasmb@bbri.harvard.edu
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 12:23:17 GMT0BST
radial step intervals in the XL scanning abs optics
Hi RASMBers !
Trying to do a bit of hard-nosed analysis of data from scanning absorption optics,
and wanting to have data equi-spaced in r (well - thats nice for all sorts of good,
sound, numerico-analytical reasons) I was struck by how variable the step size in r
seemed to be within a given run.
With a nominal set interval of 2 micrometres, for a data set quite typica of many, I
found the following:
=============================================
STATISTICS FOR FIRST DIFFERENCE IN r:
# Valid numbers = 53
Sum = 0.1440
Mean = 2.7170e-3
Variance = 2.1684e-6
Standard deviation = 1.4725e-3
Mean abs. deviation = 1.2374e-3
Skewness = 0.5906
Kurtosis = -0.8024
Median = 2.0003e-3
Maximum = 6.0000e-3
Minimum = 9.9993e-4
=============================================
In other words, the ACTUAL mean value was 2.72 micrometres, with a standard
deviation of 1.47 micrometres, and individual values varying between 1 and 6
micrometres !!! Oddly enough, the MEDIAN value is almost precisely 2
micrometres.
I should say we have our XL-A regularly serviced, and the slit scanning system was
specifically checked (and its radial calibration) not long ago.
What is the general experience here of XL users ? Is this just one of those things
one has to put up with ?
Best wishes to all
Arthur Rowe
*************************************************
Professor Arthur J Rowe
NCMH Business Centre
University of Nottingham
School of Biological Sciences
Sutton Bonington
Leicestershire LE12 5RD UK
phone/voicemail +44 (0)115 951 6156
phone/telefax +44 (0)115 951 6157
email arthur.rowe@nottingham.ac.uk
www.nottingham.ac.uk/ncmh/business
*************************************************
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]