Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: Borries Demeler <demeler@bioc02.uthscsa.edu>
To : rasmb@bbri.eri.harvard.edu
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 1995 18:40:36 -0500 (CDT)
Re: w^2*t
Michael,
> 1. When is time zero taken in a sedimentation velocity run in the XLA?
I assume the XLA data acquisition program queries the computer clock
(or data acquisition board clock) as soon as the rotor begins
accelerating and then queries the clock again each time a data scan
is written to a file, writing the difference in time to the data file.
This would mean that the time at the beginning of acceleration is zero.
>
> 2. Does the magnitude of omega and/or time as used by the XLA represent that
> obtained during acceleration and that obtained at constant velocity or just
> that subsequent to a constant velocity being reached?
>
> 3. How is the integral omega^2*t derived?
I didn't write the data acquisition program, but I assume it is a hardware
encoded function on the data acquisition board that calculates a (discrete)
sum of omega^2*delta-t values, the current value gets written to the datafile.
I am not sure how long delta-t is, anybody knows more detail on this, Tom
maybe? If I am not mistaken on this, and the value of delta-t is not too
long, then it wouldn't matter if you accelerate or decelerate during the
run or run at 2 different speeds, etc., the omega^2*t integral and the t
value should always allow you to calculate the theoretical start of the
experiment (run).
>
> 4. Does this derivation take into account events of different speeds used
> within the one sedimentation velocity experiment (viz. leakage tests at a
> lower speed)?
yes, for an explanation, see above.
>
> 5. What of other analysis packages currently available-do these also rely on
> the integral obtained by the XLA?
I am pretty sure Walt Stafford's DC/DT program does. My package
UltraScan automatically corrects for this for all velocity
methods coded (second moment, van Holde - Weischet, finite element
fitting).
> 6. Does the "time" format stipulated by the user (viz. HOLD, TIME, w2t) bear
> any affect upon what value of the integral of w2t "comes up" above each scan?
Please see John Philo's answer.
Hope that helps.
Best regards, -Borries
*******************************************************************************
* Borries Demeler *
* The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio *
* Dept. of Biochemistry *
* 7703 Floyd Curl Drive *
* San Antonio, Texas 78284-7760 *
* *
* Voice: (210) 567-6592 *
* Fax: (210) 567-6595 *
* E-mail: demeler@selway.umt.edu *
* demeler@bioc02.uthscsa.edu *
*******************************************************************************
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]