Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: Jack Correia <jcorreia@fiona.umsmed.edu>
To : rasmb@bbri.eri.harvard.edu
Date: Tue, 23 May 95 09:40:22 -0500
Re: Informal Database
I agree with Greg we probably all want it to be informal and
trusting. But just ask yourselves what the critical in The Critical Tables
means? Our business is about critical evaluation of data. The CRC and the
critical tables have value even today because of standards established by
critical evaluation. When data is suspect or uncorrected for some ion
effect, a footnote in the Table tells you! Raw data and undocumented
numbers have no place in either of those documents. If we as a scientific
users group as going to set up a database of anything, why would we not try
to maintain the same critical standards we were all trained under? I think
the issue is the degree of informality and the degree of documentation!
jack
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]